• Impending robots, Room 101 and the road to the Darkness on The Edge of Town....

    I'm a good listener. I listen intently - not just to what people say but their tone of voice, their accent, the pace, what they perhaps really mean, you know - all that stuff. Accents interest me - mine is hideous, a truly broad Brummie accent that I detest with a passion. But you can't help where you come from right? So when watching Paul Daniels on Room 101 I had to hit the mute button. Oh my days, I have never been so annoyed by a person's accent before. I'm not really one to judge but my that man can whine. It isn't where he comes from, I'm not offended by accents from that area of the country, but it was just him. The programme's still on mute by the way....

    So what would I put in Room 101? Well, Paul Daniels firstly. Ha.
    It is probably a question that has been asked many times. Honestly it takes some serious thought. Can I put in RnB/Rap music videos, because they offend me? Preaching that money, girls, guns, glamour means a successful way of life, meaning that every young person should aspire to be like them. Yuck. Secondly, can I put moths in? They really freak me out - like, the way they flutter and stuff. Eww....
    Next, it would have to be stupid adverts that are shown in every single commercial break, the Compare the Market meerkat springs to mind, so that would defnately go in. Wow, how easy is it to think of annoying things when you're on a roll? Finally, I would put in the White Van Man, and the reasons are obvious why they all should go in.

    What else - hmmm.......oooo the impending robots. I nearly forgot about that. I'm going to see Transformers 2 on Monday night. That's entertainment. However, I do read and listen to critics reviews and I do have to admit that I'm not much of a fan of Michael Bay. On Radio 5Live's Edinburgh Film Festival radio show Mark Kermode spent a good five to seven minutes ripping it apart. Yet, I believe at the end of Monday night I will totally agree with him. I liked the first film, it wasn't a masterpiece, far from it, but it was entertainment. However, Mark Kermode explains that Bay is like some pornographic, money making machine - objectifying women, not even calling Megan Fox a character in this film at all - just something that draws in a wider audience, reeling in money with placing a skantily clad woman next to a machine. Reaching out to those people seeking cheap thrills. Kermode also stated the film was insanely long - great, I guess I will still be digesting it Tuesday morning. But one thing that interested me the most about the review was its compelete honesty, he wasn't ripping apart the idea of robots beating each other into oblivion, no indeed, but the whole way the films have been made - it isn't about the robots at all. It is clearly about leering over the people placed on screen. The franchise was born and continues to thrive, I'm sure I will enjoy the film - but perhaps will not admire it, not in the same way audiences admire and appreciate the Spaghetti Westerns, the Godfather trilogy or early Star Wars. If you've seen it let me know what you think.....

    Finally it is six days......six days and then the Boss arrives. Glastonbury will be alive purely due to Bruce Springsteen and his E-Street Band. And I can't wait. It's going to be amazing. Springsteen turns 60 this year and I see more energy and effort in his performances than any twenty-something wanabee that is splashed over our T4 screens. If I could wish one person to live forever, it would be him - why? Because he is trying so darn hard to be immortal. And he is so nearly there...

    So, in six days Springsteen will be that beacon of light in the darkness on the edge of town. And I'm there.

  • silence is golden....

    hey people - short(ish) blog entry today. Quick question....

    Is silence really golden? I spend most of my time at work talking - to customers, to colleagues, to the radio, to myself but by the end of the day I'm shattered - not physically, but mentally tired of talking. So, well, I basically shut up when I get home. I talk to my Dad, Brother and my dog politely - you know chit chat, but I don't strike any meaningful, in-depth conversations up with them. I am basically mute.

    But is that bad? Should I be making more of an effort?

    If I go out with friends after work, I'm the listener. I talk, don't get me wrong, I speak about my day, work, family, etc - but everyone knows me as a good listener. And that is where I agree - I love listening, I am happy to listen to anyone's problems, worries, happy news, family life, work, etc.

    When watching The Gold Rush and the Kid today on my day off, I noticed that I didn't need to hear dialogue. Yes, we have the soundtrack that keeps the pace and narrative of the film, but I never realised before that dialogue didn't seem that important to me. Look at another favourite of mine - Sergio Leone's Once Upon A Time in the West - one of the top ten westerns of all time - uses hardly any dialogue and, in the first ten minutes it is basically non-existent. The use of sound effects adds all the tension needed.

    So - does not talking, just purely facial expressions and actions, etc, speak volumes? Like when your partner takes you by the hand for no reason, a hug, a glance, a cheeky smile - no words needed.

    Is it appreciation of the fact that some people don't need to say anything at all to get their message across? When a man looks at his wife across the dinner table in a restaurant, a girl taking a boy's hand when she is scared, a father patting his son on the back for that promotion, because speaking would only result in tears.

    However - there are three words that everybody wants to hear spoken aloud - even shouted from the rooftops - 'I Love You'

    I don't know, when it comes to film, it seems that sound is essential, but perhaps in real life it just isn't that way.

    Do you have a certain 'look' that speaks volumes?  A certain smile? A nervous tic? Are you the silent type or are you at your happiest when you are chatting away?

  • what's luck got to do with it.....

    Is luck on your side? Do you consider yourself one of those people that is just lucky? Everything falling into place, that kind of stuff.
    Or are we living in such a closed, depressed society, where everything seems a constant struggle, to even contemplate the thought of luck?

    With the country the way it is, can any of us truly say that we are lucky? Like, everything seems to go our way, everyday?
    Politicians' expenses scandal, job losses, gangs, health scares, money worries, teenage pregnancies, immigration problems, the banking crisis and terrorism - not exactly an easy life for the everyday person. Oh, and lets not forget the Jordan and Peter saga, yeah, cos that's really gonna change the world. Oh dear.....

    Four leaf clovers, wishbones, horseshoes and a rabbit's foot - do we really consider these lucky? Do people live by superstition - does it control their way of life? Avoiding black cats, walking under ladders, fearing the number 13 - common talking points - but are they the carriers of bad luck?

    Are you one of those people that just never seem to catch a break - a string of bad luck that seems never ending and relentless?
    I sometimes find myself contemplating 'what if?' when it comes to events throughout my day - what if I hadn't turned left instead of right? what if I had sat in a different chair in Starbucks? What if I had given that guy my number in that bar last week? Then again, it seems pointless to think about the past, because, well, it's not as if I can miraculously turn back time is it.

    What about a truly Bad Day? I capitalise it like it is some anniversary or national event - but it is an event. Everyone has had one of those days. I remember when I was younger I had such a day - I got to about nine o'clock in the evening and I just burst out in anger, things were just not going right and I couldn't take it anymore. It played out like some slapstick comedy of horrendous events, mistakes, problems and disasters. However simple they seemed whenever you have a whole day of it you can't take it anymore.

    So are you born lucky? To a certain extent I believe you can make your own luck, but is there some outsider watching over you, deciding your fate, or just pointing you in the right direction? Do you get dealt a card when your are born - good or bad, easy life or hard? How good is it to have a completely lucky day? Is it even possible to have such a thing?

    Answers on a postcard people xoxo

  • the reality is.....

    that life just isn't the movies is it? but what I noticed when flicking through the channels and stumbling across Britain's Got Talent is that for some people it is so close. They live their whole life in some kind of monotonous routine, never really standing out, wandering 'what if?' and just managing to get by. But for those three minutes or so when they are up on that stage they are living the dream, to use that old cliche, and getting as close to those characters we see in films, where all the attention is focused on them. And.....if they win, if they reach that finishing post, then it is the climax - the pivotal moment we see characters reach in their lives on the big screen.
    For those contestants on reality shows, like Britain's Got Talent, their life plays out like some kind of stage play - a character that most of us can relate to, coming from a humble background, working hard, doing their best - only to hit the big time, in a very public forum, more public than previous generations. Never before have we had such a number of shows where talented people, some more talented than others to be fair, have to perform to get a 'yes' or 'no.' To stand in front of a panel of judges to be told how great you are, or how insane or rubbish you are if a dancing Darth Vader is anything to go by, is sensational - I don't usually watch reality television, but I find myself staring like some crazed fan at how the narrative plays out. Because that is essentially what shows like Britain's Got Talent are - a film, a documentary perhaps, with a multi-stranded narrative where the audience go through a voyage of discovery with each character (or contestant).
    But what about those people who don't have that fifteen minutes of fame? What is the equivalent? The moment you get that promotion you were dreaming of? The minute you and a partner realise that you are bringing a new life into the world? Or something as simple as finishing a painting, taking that perfect photograph, or realising that person is the one you want to be with? I say simple, perhaps I mean satisfying.

    So what has been your closest-to-film/stageplay-moment? Your fifteen minutes? For me, it was standing up to a bully and coming out the other side stronger.

    I wait in anticipation for how the epic reality plays out. I hope your fifteen minutes is all you hoped for.
    xoxo.

  • RocknRolla.....Mumbles, One-Two and Handsome Bob too...

    To begin with I didn't watch this film at the cinema. But watching it for the first time the other night, I couldn't fathom out why. I loved it. It was Guy Ritchie truly back to his best. Gangsters, shootings, torture, drugs, lies, cheating and corruption. What more could you want? I love gangster films. If I had to pick the type of films that I can't get enough of it would be gangster films. I shouldn't really talk about the glamorisation of it - films like Once Upon A Time in America, The Departed, City of God and obviously the Godfather trilogy teach us that gangs aren't glamorous. But RocknRolla was a fast-paced, highly intelligent film - clever script, comical dialogue and with brilliant acting it took me back to the days when I first watched Snatch and Lock Stock.

    Storyline - Lenny (Tom Wilkinson) is the big cheese in the London underworld. He controls all goings on, in this case, it is real estate. Serving as his right-hand man (and the film's narrator), is Archie, played by Mark Strong. Lenny's big dealings and connections become clear when he meets up with a wealthy Russian, who needs Lenny to help him secure a major deal where planning permission is needed. Obviously, as with every gangster film, money is what gets people talking and co-operating. In this case Lenny and his gang are good for seven million euros from Omovich, the Russian. No messing about here then. As a show of faith, or a test, perhaps, Omovich gives Lenny his lucky painting. I thought this a little odd, to begin with, but I trusted Ritchie to come through with some kind of genius plot. In steps Thandie Newton, as the Accountant. Omovich asks her to transfer the money to Lenny, in cash (how gangsters always work, I believe). Now, Stella (Thandie) may seem all sweetness and like but appears to be bored of her life, branching out with a band of thieves - The Wild Bunch. As I was watching this, being quickly introduced to Mumbles, One-Two, Handsome Bob, Cookie (Idris Elba, Gerard Butler, Tom Hardy and Matt King) and the rest I could only assume that this was Ritchie fitting in with the stereotype of the hard man - never revealing their true identity, always using a nickname and generally making the characters unforgettable. I for one, did not forget Handsome Bob easily, especially when his revelation about his sexuality lead to a reel of comedy jokes, actions and one-liners. (Mumbles: "If I could be half the human being Bob is at the cost of being a poof, I'd have to think about it. Not for very long, but I'd have to pause.") The fact that this gaggle had openly accepted Bob was very 21st century. Along with the fact that he uses it to help the Wild Bunch on their quest brings a smile. Ritchie has all his bases covered it seems.

    Anyways, Stella instructs the Wild Bunch to intercept the money before it reaches its destination for her 20 per cent of the cut. It goes from bad to worse for both Lenny and his Russian counterpart when the lucky painting is stolen. However, there is only one suspect to consider - Lenny's stepson Johnny Quid, a drug-addicted, brain-addled rock star who is pretending to be dead. Why of course! I hear you cry. Confused yet? This all leads to a comedy of errors, some may say - Johnny's managers trying to track him down in the fear that Lenny's gang may shut their club down, Archie running here and there trying to find the said painting (which we never see by the way, just the back of the frame) and Omovich calls in his seemingly indestructable henchman to transport another seven million to Lenny, attempt number two by the Wild Bunch doesn't go as smoothly. I won't ruin it - but I will say I haven't laughed so hard for quite some time. The sheer determination portrayed by Ritchie of both parties is extraordinary.

    The underlying, yet the most important strand of the narrative is that there is someone in the ranks ratting people out - naming names to avoid jail-time and to gain favours in and around town. The example here is that Handsome Bob is facing a lengthy five year stretch in jail - something that is depressing him enormously through the first half of the film. When Bob reveals he doesn't want the pre-arranged escort girls, drugs and drink of his last night and that all he wants is One-Two I seriously wondered how far Ritchie's grasp on real-life situations was - however, as I have mentioned before, it leads to some seriously funny acting and witty banter. We do also live in a very modern age - surely our society isn't that stone age to realise that not all gangsters are straight, over 6ft with slicked back hair and a designer suit - being gay doesn't mean you can't beat a man to a pulp. Through this underlying story of the rat, the audience gain an insight into the background of some of the characters - the fact that most of them have served lengthy jail terms due to said rat makes you realise the vicious circle these people are living in.

    After One-Two delivers the second batch of money to Stella, thoroughly battered and bruised from his encounter with Omovich's henchmen he returns to his flat to find the infamous painting everyone is on the hunt for (stolen from Johnny by fellow junkies who in turn sell it to Cookie who then gives it to One-Two to use to impress Stella - not aiding the confusion here am I?). Then comes the second round with the Russians, who for some reason delight in the fact they tie One-Two to the bed, each strip down to their cringingly tight underwear and lay out their swords and knives, which they are obviously going to torture One-Two with, before a slow death.

    Thank the Lord for Archie!

    Through contacts Archie realises it is The Wild Bunch who have been stealing the money and goes round to One-Two's to collect him to appear infront of Lenny, which will also surely lead to a slow death. (Crayfish is Archie's particular mode of torture this month). Finding two skantily clad Russians and the man tied to the bed the henchmen are finally killed and One-Two is tied up and taken with Archie and the gang. Mumbles, Handsome Bob, Johnny and his managers go along for the ride too. Ritchie's ability to ensure all characters meet at the end is clever, avoiding all the 'what happened to them then?" etc.

    Now all together, Handsome Bob can finally reveal the name (albeit a pseudonym) and details of the rat who is to blame for all the time they have seen. And it isn't only Bob that knows it - Johnny isn't so clueless as he may seem.

    I have to say that Johnny's drug fuelled nonsense that he so often speaks makes you have to constantly remind yourself that this man isn't a junkie, just playing a man who is a junkie. But we have all seen people like him though - his portrayal is surprisingly accurate. His relationship with his step-father is interesting - seemingly always a burden to Lenny you can almost forgive Johnny for turning out the way he did. Johnny's comedy is more obviously madness, especially when he finally meets up with his father - who responds by shooting him in the stomach, going on to retort that he can't even shoot him in the right place to shut him up. (Johnny: "You're only six feet away.") To shut him up is the exact reason Lenny has shot Johnny - as Johnny is also about to reveal the snitch. Only one look by Archie at the name and the secret is out - he has seen the name Sidney Shaw for the many past years, on the end of the pen of his boss. Archie furious, turns to the crayfish for punishment. Everyone gets out alive, apart from Sidney Shaw of course. All's well that ends well. Until the next time, of course. Ritchie plans to make another, and another.

    And the painting? Well, Johnny gets it back, but as Archie says 'it did cos a Russian an arm and a leg.'

    This film brought to life the wittiest banter, one-liners and jokes I have heard in a long time, along with a completely believable cast. A blast from start to end. Not exactly original, but outstanding none the less.

    A piece on the newly revealed, and highly anticipated, trailer for Sherlock Holmes - I assure you, it does not disappoint.
    CONTAINS SPOILERS.
    In my younger years all I remember of Holmes was Jeremy Brett, alongside David Burke as his sidekick Watson - an epic television series that I thought could never possibly be beaten - it was respectful of Conan Doyle's hero and brilliantly made. However, it does appear that Guy Ritchie may have thrust Sherlock Holmes into the eye of the 21st Century viewer. Mention Sherlock Holmes to a 16 year old and they would probably reply 'Who?' or just cringe at the thought of actually finding the character interesting or enthralling. Ritchie will reach out to the cynics, the skeptics and the unbelievers.

    The trailer begins with Mark Strong, working on his third film with Ritchie, playing Lord Blackwood, who, we hear has apparently risen from the dead. Blackwood versus Holmes it is then.
    I didn't pay much attention to Downey Jr's accent, as I was too busy marvelling the fact that he had just jumped through a window of the Houses of Parliament into the Thames. However, his somewhat scruffy, unkept appearance comes across as refreshing, as many peoples' views on Holmes are of a very smart fellow with a pipe. Well, the pipe is there, at least.
    The comedy is obvious, not exactly in the same style as RocknRolla but still inkeeping with Ritchie's genius way of storytelling. Jude Law, as Watson, seems solid and an evident relationship with Downey Jr is convincing and intriguing. A duo for the future perhaps?
    For what seems like a two minute fleeting trailer, Ritchie has managed to include most forms of torture or killing - from electric shocks, to hammers, pistols, swords, through to even fighting with truncheons and not forgetting bare knuckle fighting.      Explosions, gun fights, girls - it is Guy Ritchie playing to his strengths. Even with a very impressive Victorian setting it seems more up-to-date than ever.
    The ending of the trailer is also a stroke of genius - Downey Jr sitting handcuffed naked, I may add, on a bed? It could only leave us wanting more surely? It did me.

  • The everyday american.....who never really was

    Paul Newman was born into stardom - but he didn't care. He was an actor, whose whole world wasn't really acting. Yet forever and always he will be an icon. Along with those unforgettable eyes.

    Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid was one of those stand out films for me. From previous successes in The Hustler, Hud and Cool Hand Luke, Newman began the first of two films directed by George Ray Hill.
    I thought, first and foremost, this was a western like no other - I have never seen and doubt will ever see, anything like it. The writing was witty and humourous, but made the most of the obvious friendship and chemistry between Redford and Newman. It feels like a photo-montage of skits and ideas one after the other. Before I watched this film I knew that Conrad Hall had worked on the picture - a unique and awe inspiring cinematographer that made everything flow and seem so simple. Like a dream.

    Butch Cassiy and the Sundance Kid begins with that music - stuttered like the imagery and opening credits. The first shot of Newman made me gasp, I'm sure I'm not the only one who did - once you've got past the beauty, the masculinity you begin to do what an audience should do when watching a film - question.
    What is he looking at? Is someone watching him? Where is the camera? What is he looking for? Then we see it.......the bank. And so the story begins.

    It is the continuation of genius sound effects and structure that make the footage flow so brilliantly - Hill making something so simple as the bangs, thumps and clouts of the windows and doors closing in the bank that form a musical tune. Newman is clearly scoping out the bank.

    Switch to the card table. The other man in this duo is introduced. A vision in the form of Robert Redford. We see who the men are talking to, but we don't see who is speaking. The complete focus is on Redford. And why not? It is only him we are really interested in. We even get an idea of his character - staring at the gun, unblinking, confident. Newman acts like his conscience, talking over his shoulder, first one side then the other. It is only when those emortal words 'Sundance Kid' are mentioned do we see the reaction of the man sitting opposite - obviously Sundance's reputation precedes him.
    It is Hill and Hall's wide angle, well lit shots give the wider picture. We not only see peoples' reactions and body language but their surroundings and atmosphere. The constant use of tracking shots keep the action moving, but faces are the key to this film - Redford and Newman give just as much away when they don't speak as when they do.

    However, in parts, Newman's chiseled face shows no true emotion. I hate to use the old saying 'the eyes are the windows to the soul' but that never resonated more than in this film - Newman could portray a thousand feelings without ever uttering a word.

    Like most people who watched this film, the bicycle scene was a major highlight. Like a goofy, comedy circus act it was loveable and adorable. The shutter like shots, like flickers of imagery, when Newman is on the bike with Sundance's girl is almost like a dream - almost like we are spying in on them, peeking from behind a metaphorical curtain.

    Oh, and check the Charlie Chaplin-esque hat!

    When they ride on their horses there is the camera angle looking up at them - we, the audience, are the inferior to them - they are the stand out crowd. The people to be. Their horse are like thunder, pushing the pace, building up the climax.  I loved the fact that they became icons before my eyes in under a hour. I wanted to be there, part of their gang - even just a witness to their capers.

    The use of contrasting sound builds tension, but at the same time keeps the story on the level - never veering from reality. For instance, when the near mutiny occurs within the camp near the beginning, we have such a serious situation, yet the pleasant singing of the birds seems to keep everything calm. The scene actually turns out to be quite humorous, with Newman's 'jack the lad' antics making us laugh out loud. The repartee is inspired - it is almost like watching a stand up show.
    The dialogue, which not only is inventive and amusing, gives the impression that it is very 'what has to be said' instead of 'what you want to say'. Everything spoken word seems necessary instead of just filling time.

    The constant chasing across borders, plains, towns, through deserts and rivers never tires. I was dying to see a close up of the authorities chasing them, to see their faces, to see their persistant determination etched on their skin - but Hill forces us to be exactly in the same position as Butch and Sundance, not daring to get close enough.

    One of the truest 'buddy movies' in Hollywood history, the tale weaves through the capers of the real-life outlaws that still have people talking today. The writing was as slick as the acting and the perfect pacing leads us steadily along a life story. Newman was desperate to be the 'everyday man' on screen - to a certain extent he was successful, but his stardom set him apart from the rest - and that will never change. Redford, on the other hand, was the immortal soul, trying to be that forever young cowboy he played on screen.

    What made me sit up in surprise was that poignant moment when Butch revealed 'I've never killed a man before.' Repeated several times in the film, Sundance tells his comrade 'you just keep thinking, Butch that's what you're good at' and before Newman's revelation, we just saw Butch as the ideas man - it truly means that however many banks he robbed, he really didn't want to hurt anybody.

    The ending reminded me of the ending of the Young Guns or the conclusion of Blackadder (that utterly unforgettable scene' where they finally went 'over the top').
    We know their fate, even before they do - I almost let out a sigh of relief that we are spared the scene of them being butchered. Forever and always they were together, in everything they did. From the beginning of their journey we knew that this was the inevitable end to the tale.

  • everyone deserves their prince charming....right?

    or am I wrong?

    Do people really go through their whole life not finding their soul mate? I don't plan on getting married, it isn't that I'm against the concept, but I just don't think it is for me - but I do believe in soul mates. The not needing to get married to prove you love each other kind of relationship. The having kids thing to prove or solidify your marriage. You know - the kind of stuff you see on Jeremy Kyle.

    But what if you don't find that person you are meant to be with? What if your chance meeting doesn't happen? What if there is only one opportunity to meet that person and you miss it?

    or....what if you already met that person and you let them go?

    everyone seems to have a 'type'  - people who like blondes, brunettes, muscular men or guys with tattoos, but doesn't that restrict your vision when it comes to meeting people? I don't have a 'type' - I don't have the advantage of being thin enough or pretty enough to just pick anyone - I get to know the guy, if we get along its all good. Start off as friends and see what happens.

    I don't believe in love at first sight either - I believe a glance can stir up a thousand feelings or thoughts but not true love. I believe you can learn a lot about a person by just purely studying who they are - with no talking, no action. Just to sit beside someone and know your in the right place.

    However, what if you are alone your whole life? Is that how my life will play out?

    I never thought I would say this - but I find myself secretly searching for that prince. I may get a little distracted along the way, stray off the path, but I hope I will have the guts to find my way back again. Everyone deserves their prince charming.....right?

    At the end of the day the prince is just the prince - but he will always be different.

    Any thoughts?

  • the big question

    The first film you remember watching?
    Beauty and the Beast or Black Beauty (live action film, 1994)

    First foreign film watched?
    La Haine.

    Your first film crush?
    oooo.....Judd Nelson (Breakfast Club, St Elmo's Fire) or Matt Dillon (Rumble Fish).

    Your favourite movie icon?
    Joan Fontaine.

    Favourite director?
    Sergio Leone.

    Favourite actor?
    Sean Penn.

    Favourite actress?
    Julie Walters.

    The film that had the most impact on you?
    Rebel Without A Cause, obviously.

     

    Film you remember so well you can speak line for line?
    The Wild One.

    Best 'made for TV' film?
    Duel.

    Film that truly scared you?
    The Evil Dead.

    Film that made you cry?
    E.T. - who didn't cry at that?

    Film that you laughed most at?
    The Princess Bride....hahaha just thinking about it makes me laugh.

    Film that you can dance to/has best soundtrack?
    Footloose. Forever and always haha.

    Favourite line from a movie?
    'It's alright Andy, it's just bolognaise!' (Hot Fuzz).

    Best movie kiss?
    A Walk to Remember - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mawLx_uaus&feature=related

    or..... Jeux d'enfants - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXQ1m-p9go4

    The film that you wished you were in?
    Streetcar Named Desire, any of the Indiana Jones films (except the new one) or American Graffiti.

    Film you've seen the most?
    Back to the Future.

    Worst film ever seen?
    Waterworld. Oh dear...

    Favourite film of all time?
    Rebel Without A Cause or Star Wars: A New Hope.

    The film that most sums up your life?
    Amelie, or Groundhog Day. Requiem for a Dream - as an outsider looking on.

    Anyone got any similar answers? Anyone disagree? Answers on a postcard please.....

    xx

     

  • *singing* happy birthday!

    Happy birthday bluey dog - eight years of age, old man.

    I better explain - Blue, my Old English Sheepdog, aka Bluey Dog, is eight today.

    I know people can get a bit mushy of their pets, but I love Blue. I don't ever plan on having kids, I'm not really that way inclined, so Blue is there as kind of a companion. He is someone to talk to, a friendly face and is really cuddly. I got him a little cake and a scarf haha, he looks well trendy.

    Anybody out there who loves their pets, good for you. They are invaluable in our lives.

    Happy Birthday Blue.

    blueeeeeBlueydog.......and pose

  • have you ever.....

    .....had one of those days where you think that you will spontaneously combust?!
    .....worked so hard, stepped back, then thought - what the hell was the point?
    .....tried to please everybody, but only made yourself miserable?
    .....tried to tell it like it is, then come out as the bad guy?
    .....thought that you would get more sense out of a dancing bear than your manager at work?

    .....just cried?

    unbelievably, I answered yes for just today. Not a year, not a month - I went through all that in one day.

    Answers on a postcard please

    xoxo

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.